3 ms·
Congress could moot all of this by simply passing (or repealing existing law) a law that leaves the issues to the states in question. While online gambling pose
by the_watcher 8y ago
Congress could moot all of this by simply passing (or repealing existing law) a law that leaves the issues to the states in question. While online gambling poses issues when not all states adopt the same rules, just treat it like sales tax and require the vendor (and gambler) to obey the laws of the state of the gambler. Sure, there would be vendors and gamblers who don't obey this, but there are already gambling providers (bookies) and gamblers who aren't following state or federal law.
- Passthepeas 8y agoIt has always perplexed me why there is a desire to deal with kind of thing at the federal level in the first place. States being able to decide these things for themselves is supposed to be what makes such a massive country stay functional.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- dmurray 8y agoHuman hubris. If you're a federal lawmaker, and you know you make great laws, why wouldn't you want all 50 states to get the benefit of your wise decision-making? In so far as the federal government can unilaterally expand its reach, it will tend to do so, if just because being part of the federal government makes you more likely to think things should be regulated at the federal level. The authors of the Constitution knew this, and drafted it to safeguard the rights of state governments. But "states's rights" has been a dirty word for quite some time.
- kshacker 8y agoMore than hubris, the people paying you to write laws want to make sure they pay just one place and not 50 states.
- dgzl 8y ago> Congress could moot all of this by simply passing (or repealing existing law) a law that leaves the issues to the states in question. You mean like your 9th and 10th Amendment rights from the Bill of Rights?