You make a good point about the consultants without experience and I think this document is working toward fixing it: make sure you ask the questions that ensur

You make a good point about the consultants without experience and I think this document is working toward fixing it: make sure you ask the questions that ensure contractors (especially) demonstrate they have done this and know what they're doing, rather than relying 100% on the proposal. Given the DoD's (and Government, FAR-governed) proposal process, it's exceptionally hard to get real proof that an organization knows what it is doing so language is really important. While not a guarantee, you can at least feel slightly better about a proposal that speaks the right language about these topics instead of parroting talking points that indicate less hands-on experience. Agile vehicles at DHS and GSA have tried this but have yet to gain serious traction - I look forward to see how this evolves. Ensuring you get the right folks on the ground / staffed AFTER the award is also part of the problem, but one step at a time!