5 ms·
IMO, the Wikivoyage link is a better one: https://en.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Avoiding_travel_through_the_United_States https://en.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Avoiding_trave
by owenmarshall 8y ago
IMO, the Wikivoyage link is a better one:
https://en.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Avoiding_travel_through_the_United_States https://en.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Avoiding_travel_through_the_U...
In general I'd recommend Wikivoyage over Wikitravel - the material seems fresher and it is run by a community rather than a corporation with heavy-handed policies.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- paulgb 8y agoFor anyone new to the distinction, Internet Brands bought Wikitravel and the community didn't like that, so they forked to Wikivoyage. IB tried suing Wikivoyage for this despite it being allowed under the content license -- either IB didn't do their due diligence on the license of the content they bought, or they thought they could bully the community fork through the cost of fighting it alone. It was eventually thrown out of court, as it should have been. Wikivoyage is now hosted by Wikimedia, the same nonprofit that hosts Wikipedia.
- toomuchtodo 8y agoThank you for the context.
- cjensen 8y agoJust to really emphasize this... Internet Brands literally sued one of the volunteer admins for this[1]. Please use Wikivoyage instead! [1] Disclosure: As an admin, I may or may not have been one of the "unnamed co-conspirators" in the lawsuit before IB dropped the suit
- cedivad 8y agoThat reads like vBulletin vs XenForo to me. Funny.
- medmunds 8y ago> recommend Wikivoyage over Wikitravel Seconded. Wikivoyage was a fork of Wikitrsvel. The history is... interesting: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Brands#Wikitravel_and_Wikimedia https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Brands#Wikitravel_a...
- metalliqaz 8y agoNon-mobile link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Brands#Wikitravel_and_Wikimedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Brands#Wikitravel_and...
- turdnagel 8y agoAre there any community guidelines around linking to sources when making claims about what a party might have said? On that very page is the claim: > US officials have said Canadians may be banned for life from entering the US for legally smoking it, or for working for or investing in the legal companies involved. Which may very well be true, but cannot be verified without a source.
- trynewideas 8y agoJust checked the article Talk page and the editor who added it linked to https://www.thestar.com/amp/news/cannabis/2018/09/13/canadians-who-smoke-marijuana-legally-or-work-or-invest-in-the-industry-will-be-barred-from-the-us-customs-and-border-protection-official.html https://www.thestar.com/amp/news/cannabis/2018/09/13/canadia... from there.