4 ms·
Not a very informative article. All it manages to say is that deep packet inspection does not work with encrypted traffic. I think author is not aware of transp
by drieddust 8y ago
Not a very informative article. All it manages to say is that deep packet inspection does not work with encrypted traffic. I think author is not aware of transparent deep packet inspection of SSL traffic. Here is one such product doing it.
https://www.sonicwall.com/en-us/products/firewalls/security-services/dpi-ssl https://www.sonicwall.com/en-us/products/firewalls/security-...
- detaro 8y agoThe article describes such products, so the author clearly is aware of their existence.
- mnw21cam 8y agoActually, that's kind of what the whole of the second half of the article is about.
- corebit 8y agoThat’s just a run-of-the-mill MITM privacy violator
- SideburnsOfDoom 8y agoYes, but I don't think the article explains why it is, or will be, "dead". Companies that have them don't want to give them up. What compelling reason would make them? "Employee privacy at work" is not one. Not with the level of perceived threat of malware downloads and trojaned NPM packages.