Number 3 also requires the reader to infer iff. But it's not an unreasonable requirement because without inferring iff you get "Judge Wilson believes one has t

Number 3 also requires the reader to infer iff. But it's not an unreasonable requirement because without inferring iff you get "Judge Wilson believes one has the right to end the life all living things" and "Doctor Simmi believes the surgery should proceed no matter what" Still, I imagine that's enough to throw of an unknown percent of people, alas. >I am afraid that the only conclusion here is that, in the absence of a clear logical argument to evaluate, (either due to ambiguity or complexity), people fall back on their beliefs. Still an interesting conclusion though.