4 ms·
You may well be right. That's a good point about not having to engage heavily with it. Most other people in this thread seem to be indicating that this is how i
by mr_custard 8y ago
You may well be right. That's a good point about not having to engage heavily with it. Most other people in this thread seem to be indicating that this is how it is (wearing pants is required), and that I'm a no-pants outlier.
If I ever get within a sniff of being near the breadline, then of course I shouldn't rule out re-joining LinkedIn, in order to protect myself from destitution, but things are okay for me right now.
I originally left because LinkedIn triggered my "3 strikes and you're out" policy on spam and sneaky dark pattern preferences UI. Have they improved their behaviour in that area?
Oh, they exposed my password to the internet and they also stole all my Google contacts in the early days (2009?) without my permission. Nasty stuff.
I'm also worried about exposing too much personal history in terms of identity theft. The less data out there, the better (?).
- SketchySeaBeast 8y agoI mean, if you're having success as a no-pants outlier, you do you, live that dream. Yeah, they haven't been great (spam, passwords, contact hijacking), but I just see it as the cost of working.
- mr_custard 8y ago> I just see it as the cost of working I sincerely mean this without any snark or sarcasm: You've given me something to think about. Thanks! Goes to look for pants...