So 13 percent of their investment targets had at least one female founder which corresponds with the industry as a whole quite closely (15.5 percent). They don

So 13 percent of their investment targets had at least one female founder which corresponds with the industry as a whole quite closely (15.5 percent). They don't seem to be contributing either way, just following the status quo. Primary reasons may just as well lie elsewhere. Are less females trying to raise capital? Or are they raising capital differently that may cause this effect (different industries/motivations/methods)?