3 ms·
Not mentioned here is that Tawla had a slightly rough start [1] (that they purportedly righted): > My reactions were mixed on my first visit, but by the third,
by boulos 8y ago
Not mentioned here is that Tawla had a slightly rough start [1] (that they purportedly righted):
> My reactions were mixed on my first visit, but by the third, I was a major supporter. Flavors blossomed, and I could sense the kitchen becoming more confident.
I went early on, found the food to be reasonable but not great, and ultimately didn’t return. Roughly, she shot for Mourad-level prices, but without the track record or execution. I grew up with this food, and while (again) it was okay, it simply wasn’t great. For $16, that should be an amazing dish of mujadara.
I assume many people felt that they’d rather get tastier middle eastern food, rather than feel hip with the pretty decor. I’d love to see an upscale middle eastern restaurant succeed, but the food has to come first.
[1] https://www.sfchronicle.com/restaurants/diningout/article/Tawla-is-the-Mediterranean-restaurant-that-S-F-9124825.php https://www.sfchronicle.com/restaurants/diningout/article/Ta...
- eigenvector 8y agoThis is a serial problem with Middle Eastern restaurants. For lovers of the cuisine, there's always cheap and delicious alternatives, so we feel a little betrayed paying 2 or 3x for the same dish and finding it isn't as tasty the hole-in-the-wall joint with plastic tables. This isn't a knock on Tawla specifically, but as you said, the food has to come first. I am willing to pay, but when I leave I don't want to be thinking of a $15 meal I had that was better.