> guy fabricated data to fool the editors What is your source for this? My understanding was that the papers were written in a specific style, but they did not

> guy fabricated data to fool the editors What is your source for this? My understanding was that the papers were written in a specific style, but they did not contain falsified data. https://areomagazine.com/2018/10/02/academic-grievance-studies-and-the-corruption-of-scholarship/ https://areomagazine.com/2018/10/02/academic-grievance-studi... Regardless, in almost all cases, reviewers do eye-ball the data for obvious inconsistencies / irregularities.