3 ms·

My whole post was that you can’t throw around absolutes while mocking people throwing around absolutes. Which is exactly what you are doing. You can practice s

My whole post was that you can’t throw around absolutes while mocking people throwing around absolutes. Which is exactly what you are doing. You can practice science. You can’t “believe” in it. The only ‘facts’ here are that we don’t know what causes autism. It does not appear to be genetic as I understand it. It’s entirely possible that in some people it’s triggered during something that happens with the vaccine process. We just don’t know. It’s unlikely, it’s not a reason to withhold vaccines, but scientifically it’s not a fact to say vaccines definitely does or does not cause autism in some people. I’m sure that last sentience makes you mad, which again, is very unscientific. Try taking the absolutes out, and question everything including the big things.

naasking 8y ago
> My whole post was that you can’t throw around absolutes while mocking people throwing around absolutes. Which is exactly what you are doing. No, I'm "mocking" people that "throw around" falsehoods. > The only ‘facts’ here are that we don’t know what causes autism. Incorrect. It's also a fact that it's not connected to vaccines. > It’s entirely possible that in some people it’s triggered during something that happens with the vaccine process. Nope, because then we'd see evidence of it. Which we don't, after hundreds of thousands of samples. Furthermore, analysis from the other direction have demonstrated that most of the "rise" in autism is due to better diagnostics. So we have here no observation of any connection between autism and vaccines, and from the other side the diagnostic changes have mostly been accounted for. Where do you think an alleged connection to vaccines would hide? Face it, vaccines do not cause autism. There is and never was any reason to connect the two, just like there is little reason to connect vaccines with lightning strikes.

naasking 8y ago

> My whole post was that you can’t throw around absolutes while mocking people throwing around absolutes. Which is exactly what you are doing. No, I'm "mocking" people that "throw around" falsehoods. > The only ‘facts’ here are that we don’t know what causes autism. Incorrect. It's also a fact that it's not connected to vaccines. > It’s entirely possible that in some people it’s triggered during something that happens with the vaccine process. Nope, because then we'd see evidence of it. Which we don't, after hundreds of thousands of samples. Furthermore, analysis from the other direction have demonstrated that most of the "rise" in autism is due to better diagnostics. So we have here no observation of any connection between autism and vaccines, and from the other side the diagnostic changes have mostly been accounted for. Where do you think an alleged connection to vaccines would hide? Face it, vaccines do not cause autism. There is and never was any reason to connect the two, just like there is little reason to connect vaccines with lightning strikes.