3 ms·
At the very least, it would be good to release an sf3 version; sf3 uses ogg compression (as opposed to mp3). This can be 10x smaller for comparable quality. Th
by Birch-san 8y ago
At the very least, it would be good to release an sf3 version; sf3 uses ogg compression (as opposed to mp3). This can be 10x smaller for comparable quality.
Though I found that (fluidsynth, at least) is very slow at loading sf3. Takes a few seconds.
- voltagex_ 8y agoI wonder how hard it would be to write a non-compliant SoundFont that uses Opus - Ogg Vorbis is very old at this point and not as good as newer codecs. Edit: that was a fun rabbit hole SF2.04, owned by Creative. http://freepats.zenvoid.org/sf2/sfspec24.pdf http://freepats.zenvoid.org/sf2/sfspec24.pdf SF3 is "just" Ogg compressed SF2, but there's no spec and it seems like it's only implemented in http://www.fluidsynth.org/ http://www.fluidsynth.org/ Edit edit: in the SF2.04 spec - "hydra - A. A nine-headed mythical beast. B. The nine “pdta” sub-chunks which make up the SoundFont articulation data."