6 ms·

You still use a desktop? The portability of a laptop is something I couldn't do without.

by asaph 8y ago

mclehman 8y ago
There's nothing that precludes you from having both. My computing needs are adequately met by my laptop, desktop, and personal server at work. Without the laptop, I definitely wouldn't be anywhere near as productive but the same goes for the desktop. My laptop is always ssh-ed (mosh provides the "always" aspect) into one of the others anyway. It's stuck with 8GB of RAM which is often a bottleneck, especially since Docker holds onto a couple gigs and Chrome tries its hardest to get the rest. Portability is necessary but not sufficient to addrrss my computing needs.
mastazi 8y ago
Depending on your requirements you could make it work with a powerful desktop and small and lightweight (but obviously not powerful) laptop, at least I found that’s what works for me rather than those giant and heavy “desktop-replacement” laptops. It gives me the best of both worlds.
- TeMPOraL 8y ago
  I'm running that configuration with a somewhat powerful desktop and an el-cheapo 10.1″ 2-in-1 (worth ~$200, I bought an used one for ~$120). I was initially saving up to replace the latter with a powerful small laptop, but over the past couple of months necessity made me learn to work more over SSH. So today, I can do 90% of my work somewhat comfortably on that small 2-in-1 via SSH-ing to my desktop and running an extra Emacs frame in terminal. Since that's just a "view" of the same instance I have running in GUI mode on my desktop, I can switch between the two machines almost completely seamlessly. This fits my current needs so well that I actually refrained from buying new hardware right now, and will just keep the money in a "hardware fund" until the poor little 2-in-1 dies.
  - mastazi 8y ago
    Yes this is very similar to my workflow. I have pretty much given up on finding a "powerful but small" laptop because I realised that this type of machine is also guaranteed to suffer from thermal throttling
sn41 8y ago
I have 1 desktop and 3 laptops. Sometimes it's good to have a large screen and a comfortable (ergonomic) keyboard. Rigging these to a MacBook with a USB-C can be done, but sometimes it's better to use a desktop.
skookumchuck 8y ago
It's impossible for me to write code on the weenie screen of a laptop. Plus I hate the laptop chicklet keyboards and the touchpad that my palm is always accidentally brushing against. If I could, I'd have a 4x8 foot display with no decrease in pixel density. I.e. an incredible number of pixels. Heck, why stop there. Give me a wall sized display! Phooey on laptops.
- leeoniya 8y ago
  > If I could, I'd have a 4x8 foot display with no decrease in pixel density. I.e. an incredible number of pixels. i think you would find this setup to be really poor. you need be within ~2ft viewing to appreciate the difference between 1080p and 4k at 24" diagonal display size. sitting 2ft from an 8ft wide display will give you very poor viewing angles for the majority of the content. at greater distances than 2ft, the pixel density of a 4k 24" display become nothing more than waste of gpu, cpu and electricity.
  - taneq 8y ago
    I have a 5x1 monitor wall and it's great for coding, but it curves around through 90° so all the screens are equidistant. Portrait mode is so much better for coding (for me) and I can see multiple source files, application, documentation and reference material all at once. It's great!
  - skookumchuck 8y ago
    Maybe. I know I could easily make use of one double (in both x and y) the size I currently have. As for discerning pixels, I know that the retina display is distinctly easier to read than non-retina (both from Apple) even though I could not see the pixelation on the latter. Watching video does not make much difference, but reading text sure does.
    - bluedino 8y ago
      PDF’s are a good example of things that look terrible on non-Retina displays
KineticLensman 8y ago
Each of my two 1080Ti GPUs is about half the size of a laptop.

You still use a desktop? The portability of a laptop is something I couldn't do without.

by asaph 8y ago

You still use a desktop? The portability of a laptop is something I couldn't do without.

There's nothing that precludes you from having both. My computing needs are adequately met by my laptop, desktop, and personal server at work. Without the laptop, I definitely wouldn't be anywhere near as productive but the same goes for the desktop. My laptop is always ssh-ed (mosh provides the "always" aspect) into one of the others anyway. It's stuck with 8GB of RAM which is often a bottleneck, especially since Docker holds onto a couple gigs and Chrome tries its hardest to get the rest. Portability is necessary but not sufficient to addrrss my computing needs.

mastazi 8y ago

Depending on your requirements you could make it work with a powerful desktop and small and lightweight (but obviously not powerful) laptop, at least I found that’s what works for me rather than those giant and heavy “desktop-replacement” laptops. It gives me the best of both worlds.

TeMPOraL 8y ago
I'm running that configuration with a somewhat powerful desktop and an el-cheapo 10.1″ 2-in-1 (worth ~$200, I bought an used one for ~$120). I was initially saving up to replace the latter with a powerful small laptop, but over the past couple of months necessity made me learn to work more over SSH. So today, I can do 90% of my work somewhat comfortably on that small 2-in-1 via SSH-ing to my desktop and running an extra Emacs frame in terminal. Since that's just a "view" of the same instance I have running in GUI mode on my desktop, I can switch between the two machines almost completely seamlessly. This fits my current needs so well that I actually refrained from buying new hardware right now, and will just keep the money in a "hardware fund" until the poor little 2-in-1 dies.
- mastazi 8y ago
  Yes this is very similar to my workflow. I have pretty much given up on finding a "powerful but small" laptop because I realised that this type of machine is also guaranteed to suffer from thermal throttling

sn41 8y ago

I have 1 desktop and 3 laptops. Sometimes it's good to have a large screen and a comfortable (ergonomic) keyboard. Rigging these to a MacBook with a USB-C can be done, but sometimes it's better to use a desktop.

skookumchuck 8y ago

It's impossible for me to write code on the weenie screen of a laptop. Plus I hate the laptop chicklet keyboards and the touchpad that my palm is always accidentally brushing against. If I could, I'd have a 4x8 foot display with no decrease in pixel density. I.e. an incredible number of pixels. Heck, why stop there. Give me a wall sized display! Phooey on laptops.

leeoniya 8y ago
> If I could, I'd have a 4x8 foot display with no decrease in pixel density. I.e. an incredible number of pixels. i think you would find this setup to be really poor. you need be within ~2ft viewing to appreciate the difference between 1080p and 4k at 24" diagonal display size. sitting 2ft from an 8ft wide display will give you very poor viewing angles for the majority of the content. at greater distances than 2ft, the pixel density of a 4k 24" display become nothing more than waste of gpu, cpu and electricity.
- taneq 8y ago
  I have a 5x1 monitor wall and it's great for coding, but it curves around through 90° so all the screens are equidistant. Portrait mode is so much better for coding (for me) and I can see multiple source files, application, documentation and reference material all at once. It's great!
- skookumchuck 8y ago
  Maybe. I know I could easily make use of one double (in both x and y) the size I currently have. As for discerning pixels, I know that the retina display is distinctly easier to read than non-retina (both from Apple) even though I could not see the pixelation on the latter. Watching video does not make much difference, but reading text sure does.
  - bluedino 8y ago
    PDF’s are a good example of things that look terrible on non-Retina displays

KineticLensman 8y ago

Each of my two 1080Ti GPUs is about half the size of a laptop.