> you'll have to offset this new revenue stream for them if you want them to stop I find this argument odd. It's like saying I should be penalised because comp

> you'll have to offset this new revenue stream for them if you want them to stop I find this argument odd. It's like saying I should be penalised because companies can't harvest and sell my organs, since they're being deprived of a "revenue stream". Sure, collecting personal data isn't currently against the law, but the idea that there has to be a compensation for a "potential revenue stream" is ridiculous right?