You say that you are presenting facts, but you appear to only present claims. > Nuclear is not safe. First, why is this the case? Second, how do you know tha

You say that you are presenting facts, but you appear to only present claims. > Nuclear is not safe. First, why is this the case? Second, how do you know that your supporting "why" is true? Is it possible that your source of information is biased in some way? Is it possible that there could be technological advances that have happened since 2006 when Helen wrote her book?