4 ms·
You could argue that the owner was invading the dealership employee privacy by sending in a covert recording device.
by jtokoph 8y ago
You could argue that the owner was invading the dealership employee privacy by sending in a covert recording device.
- tantalor 8y agoPrivate surveillance e.g. nanny cams are legal in USA and Canada. https://vancouversun.com/news/crime/rise-of-private-surveillance-cameras-point-to-legal-limbo https://vancouversun.com/news/crime/rise-of-private-surveill...
- mulmen 8y agoOnly in certain applications.
- chabes 8y agoDash cams are not covert..
- perl4ever 8y agoBased on the photo in the article, it seems like it was not covert. If it was covert, how could they have turned it off? I would certainly acknowledge that the dealership should be notified that it was recording, but it doesn't seem clear that anything was sprung on them.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]