6 ms·

Seriously, if you cannot see that "fire by email" is far more impersonal and disconnecting than compassionately meeting with the employee 1 on 1 and giving them

• zorga 8y ago
  A business has no responsibility to financially support an ex-employee. If it does so, it's a gift, not something that should be expected.
  • fzeroracer 8y ago
    And employees have no responsibility to stay at a company that treats ex-employees like shit. Actions like these are a great way to demoralize your workforce and entice higher-level employees to jump ship.
  • Marsymars 8y ago
    In many jurisdictions, such a responsibility does exist as mandated by law.
    • zorga 8y ago
      Not in this country.
• rhizome 8y ago
  I imagine it's possible that dehumanizing layoffs like this will put SpaceX at a competitive disadvantage, its lunch eventually getting eaten by companies who do care enough about their employees to interact with them in person regarding the business of the company and their place in it, good or bad. This would come out in increased efficiencies due to no surprise-axed-or-not email always threatening to land in their inboxes.
  • kerng 8y ago
    What is dehumanizing? Either way is awful, but companies have to make tough decisions and communicating those is not easy. Many people prefer an email over awkward semi-genuine HR discussions. Coworkers and manager will reach out afterwards in private and in person if they really cared about the connection.
    • rhizome 8y ago
      It's dehumanizing in the strictest sense of the word: communicated by text on a screen rather than in-person.
      • mulmen 8y ago
        That’s a superficial focus on human interaction that ignores he reality of business dealings.
        • rhizome 8y ago
          You're at the "contradiction" level of PG's pyramid of disagreement: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Graham_(programmer)#Graham's_Hierarchy_of_Disagreement https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Graham_(programmer)#Graha...
• BeeOnRope 8y ago
  Personally I would prefer to be fired by email versus an 1 on 1 face to face meeting. The financial support and other helpful tools seem like an orthogonal issue.
• freewilly1040 8y ago
  The 1x1 scenario still involves calling the laid off employees into meetings in sequence while everyone else stresses out wondering if they are next. Layoffs are brutal no matter what you do.
  • derekp7 8y ago
    Not only that, but as someone who has been through this in the past... What happens is you find out your department or wing of the building is next. You continue to try to do your job, meanwhile your manager starts walking towards you and stops at a couple cubicles down from you. You breath a slight sigh of relief. Meanwhile you and everyone else is prairie-dogging as others in the office start getting called out, and the VP strolls by and yells at everyone to "have some respect and quit gawking, get back to work". So now you keep your head down, and eventually get a tap on your shoulder from your manager. You can't help but fight back tears, as you get lead to the conference room where an HR drone explains the package, benefits, and next steps. You are handed a box, escorted back to your desk, and put your personal belongings into the box while being watched like a hawk to make sure you don't do anything stupid. Some things you aren't allowed to put in the box until they are thoroughly examined. A forever half finished document is on your monitor. An email you were about to reply to is still visible, and will go unanswered. Your laptop is shut down, your accounts already locked. Now you start on the walk of shame carrying the lonely box out to your car, start driving, and then your family wonders why you are home from work so early. But the look on your face tells the whole story, with the look of concern on your wife's face and the look of horror from the kids (of course, being kids, they start asking questions about how this will affect them). "Hey, kids, looks like we will be taking that camping trip a bit early, got some saved up for it, will figure out tomorrow when it gets here. It will be alright."
    • perl4ever 8y ago
      My only experience with layoffs is when one morning we suddenly had a departmental meeting, and it turned out none of us was being laid off, but our manager of over a decade was, and he was already gone, no chance to say goodbye.
    • 8y ago
• dorfsmay 8y ago
  What do you think goes through people's head as their managers walk to them "can we talk" during a staff reduction exercise? Have you ever sit across an HR person saying all the right things and putting an as empathic as possible face on, and telling you "it's not you, it's us"? Personally I'd prefer the email, as long as, I have a contact to talk to for the next steps.
• mulmen 8y ago
  I've been laid off face to face, it sucks. How is SpaceX supposed to lay off 600 people in 1 on 1 meetings and what significant difference does that even make? We don't know the content of the all hands, they could have outlined the support plan there.
• bredren 8y ago
  Why? People are hired by email all of the time. Full time positions are more transactional now than ever before. There is no real loyalty either way.
  • refurb 8y ago
    Because firing is a much different experience for employees than being hired? That should be obvious. Having gone through many layoffs, there is no way to do it where it doesn’t suck for everyone involved (those that stay or go). However, doing it in a way that show management understands the gravity of the situation goes really far in reducing how unpleasant the experience is.
  • cyberferret 8y ago
    You skipped right over the hiring facts of: the face to face interviews, consideration, and most importantly, the option for the (potential) employee to exercise their choice of whether to take the job or not. None of which is available to the employee in a 'fire by email' scenario.
    • puppymaster 8y ago
      you are assuming you know the content of the email. As others have said, severance and support programs could be outlined in the email. I prefer email over HR walking past all the cubicles praying they won't stop at mine.
• zamadatix 8y ago
  "Fire by email" isn't a bad option for layoffs in the double digit percentage as long as the delay between notification and sending the emails is low. Meeting 1 on 1 only works in non targeted low scale layoffs, anywhere else and it just creates hysteria. Also fire by email doesn't mean there isn't a definitive exit path or no financial support. The article itself states the email claimed a minimum of 8 weeks of pay for those laid off. Also it's 90/10 not 50/50. If you were firing 50% of your workforce there is no avoiding a "brutal" psychological toll for the remaining.
  • SampleBourgeois 8y ago
    Elon Musk is sticking to the Roman definition of decimation
    • cyberferret 8y ago
      I didn't want to like this, but all respect to you for the etymological accuracy and black humour here.
    • mc32 8y ago
      In percentage yes, but not in the manner of choosing the affected. Or at least one would hope it’s not every tenth person regardless of role, contribution, etc.
    • SEJeff 8y ago
      The roman definition involved beating 1 in 10 to death by the "coworkers", so no, I don't think 8 weeks of severance and helping them write resumes plus get new jobs elsewhere is a very good definition of decimation.
  • mark-r 8y ago
    Psychologically, if you don't know if you're affected yet the odds feel like 50/50.
  • cyberferret 8y ago
    > Also it's 90/10 not 50/50. If 90/10 from the company perspective. From the employee perspective, it sounds like everyone at SpaceX went home on Friday wondering "Do I have a job come Monday?". To each and every one of them, the prospect of having a job versus NOT having a job would have been 50/50 as they had no insight into the decision making process for the layoffs. Sure, for an employee who may have known they had made a lot of mistakes or were obviously underperforming etc., their knowledge that the chances of them being fired could have been skewed higher, but I am willing to bet that there will be many people thinking "My work is mission critical and I am a hard worker, I think I will be safe..." who will still unexpectedly get the pink slip on Monday.
• raz32dust 8y ago
  "SpaceX is offering a minimum of eight weeks’ pay and other benefits to laid-off workers, according to Shotwell’s email. The company will also provide assistance with career coaching, resume help and job searches." - They are supporting them through it. I think this is as bad as any other way of lay off. Those 1:1s are farcical anyway. Only thing that could be better is to just send the mail only to the laid off employees.
  • derekp7 8y ago
    Again, having gone through this a decade ago, that assistance gets outsourced to a company that specializes in it. Effectively it feels like you are attending a community college class on "how to find a job". It's not like they are going to call up a bunch of employers and try to match you to another position somewhere, you are still going to have to do a lot of legg work (home work) yourself. In my case it was somewhat beneficial, although the advice they had for me on my resume got totally shredded by the recruiters I worked with. At least it got me out of the house for 2 hours a day for the next 5 days. The big lesson I try to pass on to everyone. Don't ever assume you will have a job next week. Be polite to any headhunters, assuming they are the professional kind, keep your resume up to date, network like crazy, have a few side project plans, don't be afraid of small jobs on the side, and most importantly keep a 3 - 6 month emergency fund. That fund doesn't have to be what you make in 6 months, but at least what your bare bones expenses are (mortgage, utility bills, minimum credit card payments), and try to keep your have-to recurring monthly expenses lower (mortgage / car payments, etc). That doesn't mean you can't spend on extra stuff, just make sure you can cancel them at any time.
    • ixacto 8y ago
      Lol it's not that big a deal if you lose a job when you have around 12months living expenses saved up. So that goes twords living expenses, then you get unemployment at 60% of income. People need to move on, and stop being so emotionally invested in their work. You are most likely an at-will employee. You or the employer can terminate the relationship immediately giving any reason or no reason. Just have money saved up and don't be afraid to quit without notice to something better if you need to.
• chomp 8y ago
  The logistics of laying off 6000 people makes it very difficult to hold one on ones. Assuming 30 minutes per person, 8 hours in a day to hold meetings and 5 day work week, that's 75 person-weeks (!) just to hold one on ones. On top of that, there are security concerns with hanging onto employees and letting them have access to company property during a time that they know they will be fired. Especially for a company that performs services for top secret government projects. The easiest (though you won't catch me arguing that it's the best) way is to hold a staff meeting, and then let corp IT churn through the 6000 person list over the weekend and remove access.
  • mulmen 8y ago
    They're laying off 10% of 6,000 employees. Not everyone.
  • cyberferret 8y ago
    Firing via SQL query or an email filter. Is this what we have come to? SELECT * FROM employees ORDER BY last_performance_review_score LIMIT 600;
    • rightbyte 8y ago
      This is acctually probably how they do it.
      • mulmen 8y ago
        Typically higher scores are better. If SpaceX used this query they would fire their 600 best employees. Or they use bad column names. On top of the lame SQL reference this diminishes the true severity of firing 600 real people. We have no reason to think the firing was this nonchalant. This diminishes the work and humanity of everyone involved. It appears to be a weak reference to stack ranking. Do you have any reason to believe this is probdbly how they identified people to be let go?
        • dwd 8y ago
• wonderwonder 8y ago
  It all depends on the person, personally I would prefer the spacex method as I don't have to put on a brave face for someone who is firing me. I also don't have to walk through the office knowing everyone is feeling sorry for me. The warning also gives me a day or so to brace myself in private at my home for the email so I am not caught completely off guard. Also they fired 10% so there was a 9/10 chance they would be keeping there jobs. No matter the method its done, everyone emerges from a layoff knowing that they are just a line item on a spreadsheet. Its unfortunate but true.
• tuesdayrain 8y ago
  As someone who has been laid off, I would have much preferred an email over the awkward 1 on 1 meeting I got with my boss instead. I've been looking at other jobs already and just wanted to move on with my life. Instead I got stuck in a long conversation which was basically him just showering me with pity that I didn't want but had to graciously accept.
  • kerng 8y ago
    I can see why an email is the better option, seems much cleaner and less awkward. I have seen people go to meetings and while they are in the layoff meeting all there access is cut off - so its purely done to lure the poor employee away to avoid any odd mails afterwards. Pretty lame and distrusting honestly. Space X seems to still trust everyone fully, most companies dont.
• porpoisely 8y ago
  That's overly dramatic. I'd prefer an impersonal email over an uncomfortable and humiliating meeting with an HR employee where emotions are running high. What's to be gained by being laid off in person - other than discomfort on both sides and humiliation by laid-off employee? Just send me an email with all the options and terms and contact information for HR. If I need clarification, let me be the one that seeks HR out. Also, HR exists to protect the company, not to be your friend. There aren't there to offer compassion. That's not how business or HR works. But maybe it's because I'm from the younger generation who grew up with email, text, IM, etc. I can see older generations being used to and preferring face-to-face interaction.
  • mark-r 8y ago
    If they're at all afraid of retribution via your computer, notification via email would be impossible - you can only get the email if you still have computer access.
• qudat 8y ago
  No offense but I completely disagree. I would prefer an email over a 1v1 conversation. The employee is not getting fired, they are getting laid off. There are no conversations that need to be had beyond severance discussions.
• megablast 8y ago
  > To subject ALL your employees to the 50/50 prospect that they will have a job come next working day is tantamount to playing Russian Roulet How is it 50/50? It is 10%.
  • cyberferret 8y ago
    As I mentioned above - it is 10% from the company perspective. However, it sounded like every employee at SpaceX went home on Friday thinking "Do I still have a job come Monday??". Because no other information seemed to have been imparted as to the selection criteria for the redundancies, every single employee wouldn't have known if they would keep their jobs or not. Unless they knew they were blatant underperformers or had lots of black marks against them on file, their chances of keeping their jobs was the same as the chance they could be on the 'hit list' for redundancy. 50/50. I am willing to bet that even employees who thought their job was as safe as houses and that they were considered good employees would find them self on the 'let go' list.
• SECProto 8y ago
  I've been laid off twice, once in a one-on-one meeting with a manager, and once via an email. The email was much preferable. (Both were in short-term positions, so not really a fair comparison)