3 ms·

At the time you posted this comment, there was already at least one other hacker news reader complaining about Google Reader in this thread. Check any other thr

At the time you posted this comment, there was already at least one other hacker news reader complaining about Google Reader in this thread. Check any other thread about Google killing a thing, on this site or any other, and it's always there.

TeMPOraL 8y ago
Well, there was and there will be for foreseeable future, because Google Reader was damn useful and is a poster child of Google's habit of hyping up useful products and then canning them.
ThomPete 8y ago
Why havent anyone attempted to take over? Is it only possible for google?
- dsr_ 8y ago
  There are a dozen services and a hundred run-your-own servers. People lose detail in older memories; Google Reader did a pretty good job and had few awful problems, so it is remembered fondly. The death notice was a big shock to people who relied on it heavily, so it is remembered vividly. I set up a Tiny RSS server and have been reasonably content.
  - ThomPete 8y ago
    Thanks
  - brewdad 8y ago
    I ran my own Tiny RSS server for a while but found it was just enough hassle when updates would occasionally break minor things. I switched to paying NewsBlur $2/mo to deal with the backend and am much happier.
- CobrastanJorji 8y ago
  Feedly is one of my favorite examples of "small company in the right place at the right time." They had an RSS reader website that was, in most respects, exactly like Google Reader. They also supported easily importing Google Reader subscriptions. The day Google Reader announced it was going away, me and everyone else found Feedly and said "hey, this is basically the same thing and I can switch easily" and bam, they grew like crazy. Literally a half million users showed up on Feedly in 2 days. http://blog.feedly.com/priorities-keeping-the-site-up-and-adding-new-features/ http://blog.feedly.com/priorities-keeping-the-site-up-and-ad...
PavlovsCat 8y ago
The claim was that this reputation only exists with "nerds" who are "angry because of Google Reader". Just one counter example suffices to refute that. Personally, I think even that is a waste of time because the claim doesn't even pass the smell test. The only useful function it serves is to demonstrate double standards; if someone said "only nerds work for Google" their comment would be dead in 5 minutes.

TeMPOraL 8y ago

Well, there was and there will be for foreseeable future, because Google Reader was damn useful and is a poster child of Google's habit of hyping up useful products and then canning them.

ThomPete 8y ago

Why havent anyone attempted to take over? Is it only possible for google?

dsr_ 8y ago
There are a dozen services and a hundred run-your-own servers. People lose detail in older memories; Google Reader did a pretty good job and had few awful problems, so it is remembered fondly. The death notice was a big shock to people who relied on it heavily, so it is remembered vividly. I set up a Tiny RSS server and have been reasonably content.
- ThomPete 8y ago
  Thanks
- brewdad 8y ago
  I ran my own Tiny RSS server for a while but found it was just enough hassle when updates would occasionally break minor things. I switched to paying NewsBlur $2/mo to deal with the backend and am much happier.
CobrastanJorji 8y ago
Feedly is one of my favorite examples of "small company in the right place at the right time." They had an RSS reader website that was, in most respects, exactly like Google Reader. They also supported easily importing Google Reader subscriptions. The day Google Reader announced it was going away, me and everyone else found Feedly and said "hey, this is basically the same thing and I can switch easily" and bam, they grew like crazy. Literally a half million users showed up on Feedly in 2 days. http://blog.feedly.com/priorities-keeping-the-site-up-and-adding-new-features/ http://blog.feedly.com/priorities-keeping-the-site-up-and-ad...

PavlovsCat 8y ago

The claim was that this reputation only exists with "nerds" who are "angry because of Google Reader". Just one counter example suffices to refute that. Personally, I think even that is a waste of time because the claim doesn't even pass the smell test. The only useful function it serves is to demonstrate double standards; if someone said "only nerds work for Google" their comment would be dead in 5 minutes.