3 ms·
The latter makes intuitive sense. If you give money to the poor and needy, they will spend it on things they need (food, cars, etc..) so the money will end up b
by pazimzadeh 8y ago
The latter makes intuitive sense. If you give money to the poor and needy, they will spend it on things they need (food, cars, etc..) so the money will end up back in corporations' hands anyway.
- dunpeal 8y agoYou are assuming any of that money will end up with the "poor and needy", instead of hiring more bureaucrats whose function is often to hinder economic activity and growth by numerous rules and regulations.