4 ms·
sounds like master-slave/sub-dom relationship. it could be related to sex trafficking, or more likely just had some fetishes with willing participants.
by sergers 8y ago
sounds like master-slave/sub-dom relationship.
it could be related to sex trafficking,
or more likely just had some fetishes with willing participants.
- mc32 8y agoThere was an advocate for DA/DV victims in SF who surprisingly engaged in BDSM. He got caught putting ads on Craigslist. A couple of his “mistresses” accused him of beating them. Edit, it was a labor lawyer[1] In any event, says he it was consensual. Charges later dropped. [1]https://abc7news.com/archive/8337736/ https://abc7news.com/archive/8337736/
- ksherlock 8y agoI assume you mean "Domestic Abuse/Domestic Violence"... DVDA is also a sex term involving one girl and 4 guys. Hard to tell from the context!
- droopyEyelids 8y agoSeems like most people who own slaves could probably force the slaves to say it was consensual.
- jerf 8y agoA dedicated, authorized investigator can probably work the difference out really quickly (literally in seconds in most cases, I would imagine, as soon as they speak to the "slave"), but, by contrast, there's pretty much no data we can obtain in this debate (other than a report by an authorized investigator) that will allow us to tell the difference from here.
- ggggtez 8y agoFor better or worse, paying for sex is illegal in most places regardless of consent. The law does not have a carve out for consensual slavery either. The state can decide any consent to participate in an illegal arrangement was cohersed.
- mc32 8y agoThat’s an interesting take, has that ever resulted in a conviction you know of?
- pjc50 8y ago> paying for sex is illegal in most places regardless of consent Surprisingly, it isn't in most places: criminalising it is the "Nordic model" and not widespread. It's things around prostitution that are criminalised (advertising, running a brothel, pimping etc)