3 ms·
Exactly. The idea that Founders take on so much more ”risk” than early employees, and so deserve multiple orders of magnitude more reward is laughable. There’s
by jonathankoren 8y ago
Exactly. The idea that Founders take on so much more ”risk” than early employees, and so deserve multiple orders of magnitude more reward is laughable.
There’s no difference in the risk of a founder and employee 1. They’re both out of a job and perhaps underpaid at first.
- eanzenberg 8y agoDo you consider the value add of a founder and 1st employee the same?
- jonathankoren 8y agoYes. If the employee didn’t add a massive amounts of value, no one would have been hired. Unless it’s a sole proprietorship, founders without employees are just masturbating until they fail. No one is a philosopher king. It’s just a self serving lie to justify gross exploitation. No one provides 1000x value.