3 ms·
I agree, but you have the wrong takeaway. Improbable's knowing, selective omission of the pertinent fact that they'd been in negotiation for over a year shows
by blueboo 8y ago
I agree, but you have the wrong takeaway.
Improbable's knowing, selective omission of the pertinent fact that they'd been in negotiation for over a year shows the true nature of Improbable.
I really think Unity went above and beyond, here. And the fact that Improbable ran to their competitor to do a rapid PR stunt shows that they had their knives sharpened and ready to go. Tsk, tsk!
- jhall1468 8y agoImprobable stated, up front, that they were in negotiations with Unity. The disagreement seems to be that Unity claims they were in violation of the TOS the entire time, while Improbable claims the recent changes to the EULA are what they now violate. > I really think Unity went above and beyond, here. Nonsense. Unity likes to portray itself as the "open" alternative to other gaming engines, when in reality they have an iron-fisted grip on everything distantly involving their platform.