4 ms·
Probably because structured text is expressive, portable, and almost universally readable. And my voice isn't good enough to sing code into being without syntax
by FroshKiller 8y ago
Probably because structured text is expressive, portable, and almost universally readable. And my voice isn't good enough to sing code into being without syntax errors.
- kairichard 8y agoIn a sense this is also true for assembly - what we did here was to abstract away details and finding higher level concepts. I am wondering what is keeping us from leaving text based programming altogether. I know there are several tools that allow some kind of visual programming e.g. Unreal Engine and blender - maybe even Github Actions counts. But they all do not seem to catch on to a wider audience and I wonder why that is.
- golangMonkey 8y agoi guess voice is not an alternative but i thinking of visualising program flow could work. i like the idea from "inventing on principle" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUv66718DII https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUv66718DII)