3 ms·
"Goodbye 85th percentile rule " - is this bad? It's a flawed non-rule. In many places (including Ireland, where I live) the same roads where people drive are w
by CalRobert 8y ago
"Goodbye 85th percentile rule " - is this bad? It's a flawed non-rule.
In many places (including Ireland, where I live) the same roads where people drive are where you walk your dog or ride a bike - with no footpath. The 85th percentile guideline doesn't help them.
Remember that roads were for walking (by humans, horses, etc) and drivers turned up and stole them.
- slavak 8y agoI'm pretty confident horses, especially ones pulling carriages, aren't super safe for pedestrians either.
- NeedMoreTea 8y agoIt's a flawed rule in built up areas, and in situations like minor roads without pavement near a village, where you'd expect to see pedestrians, dog walkers, hikers etc. Many of those spots would benefit from a camera on nearing village outskirts and 30mph limit. Yet they normally don't have one. On dual carriageways, which is about the only location I ever feel annoyed by speed cameras, it's a fairly reasonable basis for setting limits. That's the situation you find reductions of limit, with associated speed camera, that are simply unexplainable from road conditions, and lack of sources of danger, risks such as built up areas etc.