3 ms·
I think Julia is the dark horse to eventually take over a wide swath of computing - possibly wider than Java or C++. As others have pointed out there's an effor
by Recurecur 8y ago
I think Julia is the dark horse to eventually take over a wide swath of computing - possibly wider than Java or C++. As others have pointed out there's an effort to produce static Julia executables, and I think it's already possible to produce libraries. One interesting datapoint is that Julia's C FFI is faster than that of C++...
https://github.com/dyu/ffi-overhead https://github.com/dyu/ffi-overhead
(For those interested, the order of the first few languages is: lua-jit, julia, c(!), c++, zig, nim, d in order of decreasing speed.)
It's extremely well thought out, concise, powerful, and readable. I think Julia's approach to types and multiple dispatch is a better alternative to traditional OO programming.
One thing the author didn't point out is that C++ (clang), Swift, Rust and Julia all use the LLVM infrastructure, resulting in extremely similar if not identical code generation. If datacenter efficiency truly becomes a priority, highly efficient languages like Julia, Rust and Swift will see increasing use for general purpose programming.
- stochastic_monk 8y agoDo you know how Julia gets such great ffi performance? Is it inlining, for instance?
- KenoFischer 8y agoIt's a bit of a JIT party trick by emitting the target address directly rather than going through the PLT.