4 ms·
> I knew a lawyer who had to defend someone in this type of case. He was allowed to view the evidence (he chose not to), but only him. No paralegals, no one els
by decebalus1 8y ago
> I knew a lawyer who had to defend someone in this type of case. He was allowed to view the evidence (he chose not to), but only him. No paralegals, no one else in his office that wasn't directly sitting on the defense table.
> If you're not granted specific authorization, even looking at this content is illegal, so Microsoft, Facebook, Apple, Google, etc have a very limited staff of people who are even authorized to handle this stuff.
With the risk of offending folks, this is such a retarded law/process. Holy fuck. This is dystopian-level letter of the law vs spirit of the law.
- kwhitefoot 8y agoCan you suggest an alternative?
- gdhbcc 8y agoNot make information illegal to possess? We don't make footage of car hackings illegal to own, why should this be any different? At the end of the day, the harm is already done, no point causing more.