There should be a distinct difference then between whether the paper is only referenced in the bibliography, or whether it is also cited. I wonder how many of

There should be a distinct difference then between whether the paper is only referenced in the bibliography, or whether it is also cited. I wonder how many of the papers actually cite the article? An article that is only referenced is pretty meaningless. Like a function that is implemented but never called. Or should be. Perhaps the problem is the way indexers assume references equal citations. To continue yesterday's interesting discussion of Latex, references should not appear unless they are cited. I used to use a huge master bibliography for everything, and assumed that Bib/Latex would sort out the things I actually cited.