4 ms·
They do? If thats not CP it should be banned as a gross violation of the child's privacy.
by astura 8y ago
They do?
If thats not CP it should be banned as a gross violation of the child's privacy.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- michaelmrose 8y agoNudity and porn aren't the same thing. Porn is media intended to provoke sexual gratification. If you prefer porn is what the majority would consider material intended for sexual gratification. Babies aren't sexual and they also don't as far as I can tell have any legal right not to have their parents take or share pictures of them. We could do well not to invent imaginary legal rights.
- astura 8y agoHuh? I didn't say it was illegal? Posting naked photos of a baby on the internet is an awful violation of a baby's privacy, so it would not be allowed on my platform.
- dvdkon 8y agoDo you really want to be the arbiter of right and wrong in all these cases? A lot of people think naked baby pictures are fine. Who are you to tell them they're not? It seems to me you want to police the whole world to make what you think is indecent disappear. Guess who also has similar ideals? Hardcore islamists (not that I'm saying wanting to block search results and creating a totalitarian regime are the same thing, but the ideal is wrong in both cases, in my opinion).