3 ms·
> There is no blurry line here. Child abuse and child pornography are clearly defined terms. In many places around the world it's clearly defined to include pu
by hirundo 8y ago
> There is no blurry line here. Child abuse and child pornography are clearly defined terms.
In many places around the world it's clearly defined to include purely fictional depictions. It seems to be rare, but there have been convictions for possessing child pornography cartoons in the US.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_drawn_pornography_depicting_minors https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_drawn_pornogra...
- kiriakasis 8y agoI believe in many places it is illegal to distribute even a novel with explicit CP. A relevant note is the distinction between production, distribution and possession (both directly or indirectly) when talking about corner cases. A 14 years old should not be incriminated of producing or possessing photos of his/her naked body, he or she could be incriminated of distribution in extreme cases (the cited case should not be one of these cases)