I think a lot of critics of the article in these comments bailed out of the article partway through. The article is an examination of the origin of sexual sele

I think a lot of critics of the article in these comments bailed out of the article partway through. The article is an examination of the origin of sexual selection. Are sexually selected traits linked to adaptive traits (originally, even if they later run away and become maladaptive), are they mere random chance, or is the truth more complicated than either of those theories?