> That said, I don't think it's normal for a "software bug" to result in such an egregious error as to require a retraction of the study. I'd like to know why t

> That said, I don't think it's normal for a "software bug" to result in such an egregious error as to require a retraction of the study. I'd like to know why the peer review process failed to detect the problem. A Bug in FMRI Software Could Invalidate 15 Years of Brain Research [1] [1]: https://www.sciencealert.com/a-bug-in-fmri-software-could-invalidate-decades-of-brain-research-scientists-discover https://www.sciencealert.com/a-bug-in-fmri-software-could-in...