Lmao I was a bit afraid this might be some surface-level API wrapper around DynamoDB, in which case this is less cool than I thought. It doesn't seem to be the

Lmao I was a bit afraid this might be some surface-level API wrapper around DynamoDB, in which case this is less cool than I thought. It doesn't seem to be the case at a first glance but I wish it was a bit more clear on the site exactly how this relates to DynamoDB, if at all. Maybe I'll just have to read more about it. Hopefully the internal architecture gets away from DynamoDB-style partitioning.