3 ms·
Right, that makes sense - I thought it was odd a Tesla employee would be commenting about it. Is co-opting a crash investigation performed by the government an
by reitzensteinm 8y ago
Right, that makes sense - I thought it was odd a Tesla employee would be commenting about it.
Is co-opting a crash investigation performed by the government and cherry picking data from it in order to cast the blame on their deceased former customer meant to be better or worse than collecting everyone's data indiscriminately?
- asdfasgasdgasdg 8y agoIt is different. Different threat models, concerning to different people for different reasons. To pick a random example, if I said "Donald Trump killed a homeless guy for looking at him the wrong way," that would be inaccurate. I don't like Donald Trump, think he's a bad guy, but I still wouldn't want to make a false or likely false accusation about him. In the same way, if I don't like that Tesla is making crash data public, I'll say that. I won't say that they're tracking everyone's movements.
- reitzensteinm 8y agoOK, but OP was saying their actions were harming consumer confidence. You supplied an alternate explanation, but if it's just as Orwellian, how is it better?
- asdfasgasdgasdg 8y agoThe person I was responding to said: > who realized that Tesla would go through their trip logs if they made even the slightest critical comment of the company which is likely false. It's irrelevant in this branch of the conversation how Orwellian my more likely explanation is, because what's being contested is the truthfulness of this claim, not how bad of a company Tesla is.