4 ms·
I would argue that Los Angeles might possibly have San Francisco beat, just slightly, but the Michelin Guide hasn’t given stars in LA for over a decade. Still,
by fcarraldo 8y ago
I would argue that Los Angeles might possibly have San Francisco beat, just slightly, but the Michelin Guide hasn’t given stars in LA for over a decade. Still, it’s no where near New York, and per capita, SF is easily top of the list.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- rdl 8y agoLA has gotten a lot better over the past 10y compared to SF's rate of improvement, and is way bigger in population. I think LA has more innovation happening (especially food trucks, weird fusion cuisines, etc.) because you can take risks there. Portland is great, too, for similar reasons. All of them (and probably >10 more cities in the US) have world-class food across multiple cuisines.