3 ms·
I think your assuming the city provides 26k+ of value on those taxes to residents. That's a dubious assumption in SF.
by anonuser123456 8y ago
I think your assuming the city provides 26k+ of value on those taxes to residents. That's a dubious assumption in SF.
- conanbatt 8y agoI don't, im pretty sure is well below that. But its how much it spends. Precisely, as homeowners are disproportionately voters, the following step would be to restrict goverment spending: who wants to pay 2600 a month for a closed transit station, heroin needles and exporting homeless people. But now, the homeowner gets a very sweet deal, probably 50k a year in rental per unit he has.