The first paragraph does a great job of summarizing and contextualizing Jackie Chan's career. But the rest of the article seems to drunkenly wonder around bump

The first paragraph does a great job of summarizing and contextualizing Jackie Chan's career. But the rest of the article seems to drunkenly wonder around bumping into rhetorical questions that don't lead anywhere other than the reporter believes that Jackie Chan didn't complain or rejoice enough in his hardships or successes. Ok, sure. I guess that's one opinion. But I'm kind of surprised that the reporter didn't have more to say than that.