2 ms·
Please tell me what you mean by aether, as rigorously as you can, and then I can give you an answer to the question which seems to be bedevilling you. Meanwhil
by raattgift 8y ago
Please tell me what you mean by aether, as rigorously as you can, and then I can give you an answer to the question which seems to be bedevilling you.
Meanwhile I can guess at what you're asking:
The Standard Model (a QFT) has interacting quantum fields obeying purely local dynamics. The behaviour "here-and-now" depends on the field-values "here". It does not depend on field-values "now" but far from "here". Moreover, the Standard Model is Lorentz-invariant, meaning its laws hold in any inertial frame of reference, thus the scare quotes in the previous sentence.
The luminiferous aether that Michelson & Morley were looking to measure was motivated by finding a single special (and universal, or at least covering the whole solar system) inertial frame of reference in which Maxwell's equations hold exactly. No such frame exists; there is a huge democracy of inertial frames in which relativistic electrodynamics is exact in the classical limit. ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preferred_frame https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preferred_frame )