3 ms·
You said to ignore the person who presented the argument that there is a bubble.
by moorhosj 8y ago
You said to ignore the person who presented the argument that there is a bubble.
- Kalium 8y agoYou're right! The poster did say that. Some might mark a distinction between "there is no bubble" and "this author's predictions of when there is a bubble are not reliable or trustworthy". The former is a pretty strong claim, requiring precisely the sort of clear and specific evidence you have wisely and correctly called for. The latter point suggests that the author should not be taken as authoritative and the evidence they present for their argument is not to be taken seriously. As a side effect, this means that the question at hand - bubble or not - remains unaddressed.