4 ms·
This makes more sense for small countries. For example, I live in Canada and unless you life in the capital of the province everything is really far away. A l
by Raphmedia 8y ago
This makes more sense for small countries.
For example, I live in Canada and unless you life in the capital of the province everything is really far away.
A lot of people live in cheap apartment blocks of rural areas and it can be a walk of pretty much an hour to get to the groceries store. There is public transit but it's usually every few hours instead of a constant traffic, so you have to plan your entire day around it.
I do agree with your main point that public transit should be one of the main investment of a country.
- magduf 8y agoMost people in the Americas live in cities, and that number is constantly increasing with urbanization. With proper urban planning and funding, public transit in the US/Canada could be far better than it is, and a useful way of getting around. But there seems to be no political will to do this. Cities in Europe are far better laid out and planned, with mixed-use development (shops on the ground floor, apartments on top), but North America seems to be allergic to this and wants subdivisions with McMansions instead.