4 ms·
Very nice! It's also interesting that it differs from this search[1] performed in HN's own search system. [1] [pdf] with filtering on Past Year -> 4,422 hits.
by ekphrasis 8y ago
Very nice!
It's also interesting that it differs from this search[1] performed in HN's own search system.
[1] [pdf] with filtering on Past Year -> 4,422 hits.
https://hn.algolia.com/?query=%5Bpdf%5D&sort=byPopularity&prefix&page=0&dateRange=pastYear&type=story https://hn.algolia.com/?query=%5Bpdf%5D&sort=byPopularity&pr...
- burtonator 8y agoYea.. there would be more total hits for PDFs found on page 2 or page 3... which I didn't analyze. 500 I think is good enough. Enough reading already ;)
- ekphrasis 8y agoSure, although the positions of the items in the answer sets at cutoff = 10 differ as well.
- burtonator 8y agomeaning the ranking? Algolia is probably using a different score algorithm. If I were designing it I would probably also factor in number of comments but I think it's fair to use number of upvotes.
- ekphrasis 8y agoI'm assuming that too. Just an observation. Very interesting work of you nonetheless!