This is not an article but a bunch of glued together tweets (you might have known, I did not) nor does it fulfill the title. Rather it poses the question: "[..

This is not an article but a bunch of glued together tweets (you might have known, I did not) nor does it fulfill the title. Rather it poses the question: "[...] what would a history of Jobs, drawing only on sources written by women, look like?" No more, no less.