3 ms·
That's a very interesting point! But it seems like you'd want a judge who had at least been a stockholder, though not one in this particular company. Would ei
by sanj 18y ago
That's a very interesting point! But it seems like you'd want a judge who had at least been a stockholder, though not one in this particular company. Would either side consider a judge that stored his life savings in his mattress and disagreed with the right of corporations to be valid?
The different (and I'll admit I'm on thin ice here) is that kids have a visceral component that is difficult to ignore.
If I drop a brick on my bare foot and yell loudly, would it be more appropriate for someone else, who has never dropped such a brick, to judge whether or not I should have yelled?
- llimllib 18y ago> The different (and I'll admit I'm on thin ice here) is that kids have a visceral component that is difficult to ignore. Exactly - and thus there is value in having a neutral(ish) observer of the parenting process.
- sanj 18y agoBy that argument, all OBGYNs should be men. Or women who've not been pregnant.
- llimllib 18y agonegative, ghostrider. Suggesting that a male obgyn may have a different and valuable perspective from a female obgyn is not the same as suggesting that all OBGYNs should be men. To be explicit, I don't claim that all articles about parenthood should be written by non-parents, just that there's a particular type of value in ones that are, since they may more successfully divorce themselves from the visceral feelings of attachment that parents have towards their children.
- sanj 18y agoYou're right. So the question then becomes: "Does a male obgyn may have a different and valuable perspective from a female obgyn?"
- Xichekolas 18y agoHow subjective is gynecology? How much room is there for 'perspective'? I think the metaphor has been taken too far to be useful here.
- iloveyouocean 18y agoI would rather have a judge that impartially followed the law and was not swayed by his personal life circumstances or beliefs.