3 ms·
Do note that UB on integer overflow is (at least nowadays) more of a compiler wish for optimization reasons than it is technically necessary (your CPU will inde
by MauranKilom 8y ago
Do note that UB on integer overflow is (at least nowadays) more of a compiler wish for optimization reasons than it is technically necessary (your CPU will indeed just wrap around if you don't live in the 80s anymore, but a C++ compiler might have assumed that won't happen for a signed loop index).