>Good. This does exactly what Nasim Taleb argues and forces the college to have "skin in the game." This philosophy operates under the assumption that colleges

>Good. This does exactly what Nasim Taleb argues and forces the college to have "skin in the game." This philosophy operates under the assumption that colleges should be beholden to an economic system that values individuals solely for their ability to grow existing capital. It's a recipe for cultural stagnation. Where do we develop entirely new modes of thought and expression [and potential new sources of wealth] if we deprioritize every activity other than those that optimize for the growth of existing wealth?