3 ms·

Thanks for the helpful explanation (TIL a new meme :)). I guess it seems the problem is the commenter using inconsistent subjects, i.e. it would make sense (eve

by danso 8y ago

Thanks for the helpful explanation (TIL a new meme :)). I guess it seems the problem is the commenter using inconsistent subjects, i.e. it would make sense (even without punctuation, or knowing the meme) had it been phrased as: > Charge for your users' locations! Charge users to change/auto-rotate their numbers! It's free real estate!

loa-in-backup 8y ago
Indeed this is what I meant. I pondered my informal phrasing afterwards. Also I entered single carriage feeds between sentences, forgetting that they're going to get stripped on HN anyway.