3 ms·
I did say "original C declaration syntax forms needs to be deprecated and only the newly invented syntax forms should be used". So the new invented syntax alone
by ambrop7 8y ago
I did say "original C declaration syntax forms needs to be deprecated and only the newly invented syntax forms should be used". So the new invented syntax alone is complete (you can express anything with &, (args)->ret and [count]type).
- watergatorman 8y agoOk, I got it now. Thanks. My faulty understanding. I believe you have a clean, readable syntax for C declarations. The Go Programming Language's declaration syntax is very similiar, except that "star" is retained and acts just as your "&" I don't have a complete list, but have been looking at classifying programming languages into one of 2 categories: Category 1 declaration syntax: Type identifier ; or Category 2 declaration syntax: identifier Type ; with perhaps a colon or other punctuation between the identifier and Type.