4 ms·

MIT teaches it as its intro now... http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=602307 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=602307 and Norvig uses it... http://www.nor

MIT teaches it as its intro now... http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=602307 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=602307 and Norvig uses it... http://www.norvig.com/python-lisp.html http://www.norvig.com/python-lisp.html I mean what more endorsement is needed? How about something really eloquent... http://norvig.com/spell-correct.html http://norvig.com/spell-correct.html

stevecooperorg 16y ago
(tl;dr: VB.NET can be every bit as expressive as Python. See my translation of Norvig) Here's a line-by-line translation of Norvig's code into VB.NET. Exactly the same number of lines, unless you count the block terminators like `End Function` and `End If`. https://github.com/stevecooperorg/Norvig-Spelling-Corrector-in-VB.NET/blob/master/NorvigSpellChecker.vb https://github.com/stevecooperorg/Norvig-Spelling-Corrector-... The translation was fairly straightforward; I'm not a regular VB.NET programmer but I cut and paste Norvig's code into Visual Studio and did some pretty trivial rewrites -- 'def train(features)' -> 'Function train(features)' -- and that got me most of the way there. I translated idiomatic python (list comprehensions) into idiomatic .net (linq expressions) but the translated code is almost identical in structure and number of code points.