3 ms·
So you are agreeing with the author, since he is critiquing Standard ML (not Haskell). It is clear that the paper was influential, since Haskell does not have t
by scscsc 8y ago
So you are agreeing with the author, since he is critiquing Standard ML (not Haskell). It is clear that the paper was influential, since Haskell does not have the shortcomings described.
- FullyFunctional 8y agoHaskell predates the paper so no, I don't agree with your interpretation