3 ms·
I wasn't talking about David Duke now, I was illustrating that it's always worked like this by examining the well known historical case of David Duke's public c
by bilbo0s 8y ago
I wasn't talking about David Duke now, I was illustrating that it's always worked like this by examining the well known historical case of David Duke's public career.
>Further, even an official can attend an exclusive private event, if they do so in their capacity as a private citizen...
This was the entire point of my post.
David Duke is free to be a guest speaker at any private event he chooses. Again, I think he'd even be encouraged to interact with constituents in this capacity. I would think any politician would be encouraged to interact with their constituents in this fashion. It only makes sense. Go to the county fair or the local Kroger or whatever and actually talk to people.
That some would have a problem with the beliefs of the constituents he chose to interact with does not constitute a problem for David Duke. He had a place people could go to see him for the public business of making comments or lodging complaints or whatever, and blacks were perfectly free to go there and do so.
That blacks couldn't go to the Klan rallies he spoke at was not a problem at all. It's not like he was at the Klan rally going over government business or something.
- tptacek 8y agoI do not believe that it's the case that a county official could hold an official meeting at a Klan rally. I can't tell if we agree about that, but it's the only thing I'm in this subthread to say.
- bilbo0s 8y agoRight. A politician has to conduct official business, in an official place. But s/he can congregate with constituents and others at as many private places, (like Klan rallies), as s/he pleases. It's not either or, s/he can, and should do both.