3 ms·
> once that the exploration There's a lot of clunky grammar in your post. Maybe it's a submarine advertisement? See how ridiculous it is to assume grammar err
by mdorazio 8y ago
> once that the exploration
There's a lot of clunky grammar in your post. Maybe it's a submarine advertisement?
See how ridiculous it is to assume grammar errors imply nefarious ends? You're not playing devil's advocate, you're backing up a crackpot statement.
- adrianmonk 8y agoI'm not backing anybody up. If someone tries to refute a crackpot but their refutation doesn't make logical sense, then their refutation doesn't make logical sense. If I point this out, it doesn't mean I support the crackpot. Logic and rational discourse are not a game where there are only two sides, and a statement against one is automatically a statement in support of the other.