OK, that convinces me: it's a lie to say that Julian Assange has never breached his bail. Version 1.3 of the document says: "It is false and defamatory to sug

OK, that convinces me: it's a lie to say that Julian Assange has never breached his bail. Version 1.3 of the document says: "It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange has ever "breached his bail", "jumped bail", absconded, fled an arrest warrant, or that he has ever been charged with such at any time." And yet we have a decision by a UK judge that Assange "failed to appear in accordance with the conditions of his bail" and that "the associate sureties should be forfeited": https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/Judgments/sureties-julian-assange-08102012.pdf https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/Ju... So while I can see why Wikileaks might try to argue that seeking asylum instead of appearing did not "breach his bail", there is a clear UK legal judgment saying that he did. It's a lie for Wikileaks to claim otherwise. Nice job. I'd suggest passing it on the author of the post (Emma Best) to see if she can publicize this clear example.